Table below shows how we compared on the various sections of the event. It's possible to add a couple of columns to each set of stats to look at power/weight and power as a % of FTP (Andrew did a MAP in January with a result of 457 which gives FTP of 343 (assuming 75% of MAP). My FTP (as per 25TT) is 305 (BTW my most recent MAP was 408 = 306 @ 75% )
Me
2008
|
71
|
kg
|
Andrew Bye
|
74
|
kg
| ||||||||
Section
|
Distance
|
Time
|
Work
|
Power
|
Npwr
|
Npwr/kg
|
Power %
|
Time
|
Work
|
Power
|
Npwr
|
Npwr/kg
|
Power %
|
Start to Glandon base
|
13
|
0:23
|
230
|
152
|
198
|
2.7
|
65
|
0:23
|
311
|
222
|
273
|
3.8
|
80
|
Glandon Climb
|
23
|
1:23
|
1262
|
254
|
268
|
3.8
|
87
|
1:04
|
1281
|
331
|
355
|
5.0
|
104
|
Glandon Descent
|
42
|
1:09
|
572
|
137
|
201
|
2.8
|
66
|
0:24
|
203
|
137
|
177
|
2.5
|
52
|
Glandon base to Telegraphe
|
0:36
|
606
|
277
|
293
|
4.1
|
85
| |||||||
Telegraphe
|
12
|
0:50
|
763
|
250
|
254
|
3.6
|
83
|
0:40
|
821
|
335
|
338
|
4.8
|
99
|
Tel descent to Gal base
|
5
|
0:07
|
29
|
74
|
119
|
1.7
|
39
|
0:06
|
239
|
171
|
239
|
3.4
|
70
|
Galibier
|
18
|
1:24
|
1112
|
224
|
229
|
3.2
|
75
|
1:06
|
1224
|
306
|
309
|
4.4
|
90
|
Gal descent to ADH base
|
48
|
1:08
|
396
|
101
|
170
|
2.4
|
56
|
1:02
|
694
|
185
|
224
|
3.2
|
65
|
Alpe D'Huez
|
13
|
1:10
|
934
|
222
|
229
|
3.2
|
75
|
0:54
|
1019
|
313
|
318
|
4.5
|
93
|
175
|
7:34
|
5298
|
195
|
230
|
3.2
|
75
|
6:19
|
6398
|
273
|
306
|
4.3
|
89
|
The statistics from Andrew Bye make impressive reading especially the absolute power on the climbs. (The first climb seems to have been done at over FTP which probably means my guess of FTP based on a January MAP is low.)
The biggest lesson for me, I think, lies in the power % column. Even if I have underestimated his FTP it looks as if Andrew rode the event at a much higher relative intensity than I did. His climbs were all over 90% and is overall ride was at 89%.
My figures seem a bit timid by comparision, after the Glandon (87%) I rode the remaining climbs at a more conservative 80>75%, with my overall effort for the ride being just 75%.
I will try to take some lessons from this:
- I am too scared of pain. Partly I am a coward, but this I think is also because I came at cycling through doing long solo tour when each day needed to be judged because there was always another (often harder) day to come. So I am more used to pacing myself to finish rather than finish fast.
- Power meters are great for training and pacing but I think I am now paying a little too much attention to mine. I felt great on the climb of the Glandon but got worried because I was over schedule and to some extent I think I made myself take it easy on the last climbs for fear of blowing up.
Coming up this weekend I will be doing another sportive (the "Legbreaker") which I entered just to get the opportunity to see a new bit of the country. I will try an experiment and tape over the displays on my Powertap and Etrex and just ride on feel. There are some tough hills on the ride and I will try to push myself up to and over my pain threshold on these. Should prove interesting...
1 comment:
Hi,
I just tripped over your blog and found this data very interesting, the w/kg for a 7.5hr ride being more attainable than I thought.
Do you have detailed data e.g. wko file you would be willing to share?
BTW, nice blog!
Regards,
Mark
liversedge/gmail/com
Post a Comment