It's the last day of 2013. Time for a bit of reflection and the BBC web site is full of reviews of the year.
One is here The Year in Numbers
First bullet is a real good news story and one that flies in the face of the torrent of horror stories/depression/cynicism that forms the bulk of most comment for most of the time.
When asked how happy they were, on a scale of 1-10, the average Briton rated themselves 7.3. Only 10% rated themselves 4 or less.
I'd say this was pretty much the best news of 2013 and a fitting way to end it.
(FWIW, I wasn't asked but had I been I think I'd score a 9)
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Monday, December 02, 2013
No food needed
I've got to the point in my training
plan where I am starting to do some long “sweetspot” workouts as
described by Hunter Allen here,.http://www.hunterallenpowerblog.com/2013/11/four-keys-to-powerful-winter-training.html?utm_source=November+2013+Power+News&utm_campaign=November+Power+News&utm_medium=email
I thought I would use these to take the
opportunity to check my previously stated assertion that you don't
need to take any calories in the form of sports nutrition for
workouts less than 2 hours long, moreover doing so will often be a
mistake. (You do ofc need to drink, but water is fine)
So yesterday I did a 2+ hour workout
comprising a warmup, 90 minutes of sweetspot at around 90% FTP and a
warmdown.
I had some porridge for breakfast
around 2 hours beforehand and during the workout nibbled one apple
just to keep my mouth fresh and not have an entirely empty stomach. I
drank around 2l of water.
Stats for the workout were:
Warmup 30 mins averaging 205W (bit
longer than planned due to some setup issues)
Sweetspot 90 minutes averaging
268W/153bpm (FTP c 300W atm, HR@ FTP 166bpm) so spot on in terms of
target power and HR zone
Warmdown 20 minutes averaging180W
The sweetspot session was reasonably
intense, equating to just over 1.5 climbs of Alpe D'Huez at 57minute
pace.
Looking at energy use the total for the
ride was just over 2000kj=pretty much same kcal. ( Using the results
of a recent ramp test I can guesstimate roughly 1500kcal of this
came from carbohydrate mostly glycogen with around 80kcal for the
apple and maybe a bit from the porridge.)
This is not just an n=1 example. Some
aspects of the workout are, I would argue, broadly applicable to most
riders regarding the question of whether and how much needs to be
eaten during a workout in order to achieve a workout goal.
Reason for this is that most folks
should have ample stores of glycogen to fuel such efforts, easily
enough to do a 1-2 hour session at a quite strenuous level. Maths are
that it is usual to have around 400-500g of glycogen are available
for use, 1G of glycogen = 4kcal. So immediately, for a 2 hour session
you need to be doing a workout burning more than 800kcal per hour
which is pretty tough (Note these are real calories as measured by a
powermeter or similar, not the inflated figures some products produce
to make their consumers feel good). Further, not every kcal burned
will come from glycogen. Some will come from food in the process of
being digested, some from fat. Fat only contributes a significant
proportion at low intensities but still even the hardest of most
workouts will include times of low intensity.
Taking all this into consideration
bottom line you need to be capable of and actually do around 280W+
non-stop for a full 2 hours before you need to worry about feeding to
accomplish a training objective for short <2 hour="" span="" workouts.="">
If you are not doing sessions as hard
as this
- If weight loss/control is one of your objectives I would absolutely recommend not taking in any significant calories during such workouts. Sports “nutrition” is mainly just junk food in the form of sugar. The calorie deficit short hard workouts produce will be far better filled by larger portions good healthy balanced meals at normal mealtimes that will stop you feeling hungry and/or allowing yourself a treat or two to make dieting more tolerable.
- If weight loss/control is not an issue. I would still advise not using any sports products as a default. Rather do without for a bit then, perhaps, introduce some in a controlled manner to see if they actually do for you what they claim on the label. Alternatively they can be an option if you hit a plateau level where you cannot improve when you can try using something to see if it helps. It may (though chances are reason will be as much psychological as physiological) in which case great, but then I'd advise weaning yourself off it to reserve for the next training plateau or as a boost for race use.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)